Helpful Hint

Clicking continue will open Attorney Public Discipline as a PDF file in another browser tab, and may take a minute to load.

Once you're viewing this PDF, you can search through it by typing CTRL + F on a PC, or CMD + F on a Mac.

Cancel Continue to PDF

The purpose of the OPC

The Office of Professional Conduct (OPC) has three primary responsibilities:


Investigate allegations against attorneys and LPPs for violating the Rules of Professional Conduct


Prosecute those allegations in accordance with the Rules of Discipline, Disability and Sanctions.


Educate members of the Bar regarding their professional ethical responsibilities through seminars and discipline notices in the Utah Bar Journal.

The purpose of the disciplinary process is to ensure and maintain the high standards of professional conduct required of those who undertake the discharge of professional responsibilities as attorneys and LPPs. The process is designed to protect the public and the administration of justice from attorneys and LPPs who have demonstrated by their conduct that they are unable or likely to be unable to discharge properly their professional responsibilities.

While the OPC is charged with investigating and prosecuting attorneys’ and LPPs’ misconduct, the office does not make the ultimate determination as to whether rules have been violated and it does not impose discipline against attorneys or LPPs. This determination is made by the Utah Supreme Court through either the Ethics and Discipline Committee or the District Courts.

Recent Developments:

In 2017 at the direction of the Utah Supreme Court, the American Bar Association (“ABA”) conducted a review of the entire disciplinary system. Based upon the ABA’s report, the Utah Supreme Court formed an ad hoc committee to evaluate the report and make recommendations regarding what changes should be implemented. As a first step, the Utah Supreme Court formed an oversight committee for the OPC, and adopted a rule to make clear that the OPC is a part of the Utah Supreme Court’s regulation of the practice of law, and not part of the Utah State Bar. On December 15, 2020 the Utah Supreme Court adopted changes to the procedural rules for attorney discipline matters to implement the recommendations.

Procedural Rules We’re Governed By:

All disciplinary proceedings are conducted in accordance with the process described in the Rules of Discipline, Disability and Sanctions (“the Rules”). The Rules are construed to achieve “substantial justice and fairness in disciplinary matters with dispatch and at the least expense to all concerned parties.”